Michael Crichton - Unpopular Truth (by LibertyPen)
Freedomain Radio is the largest and most popular philosophy show on the web - http://www.freedomainradio.com
Donations gratefully accepted at http://www.fdrurl.com/donate
http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell…
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw…
Poor Richard's News: GLOBAL WARMING ALERT! Liberal journalist admits polar bears increasing in numbers, not dying out
He’s the poster boy for the global warming alarmists: the polar bear, dying out because evil humans are driving too many cars and eating too much beef. Well, all that turns out to be a bunch a baloney, and one liberal journalist is finally seeing the light.
from Wall Street Journal:
I knew I was in trouble when the biologist from the Manitoba Conservation Department sat down next to me. “The bears look good,” he said. “I haven’t seen them this fat in years.” We’d both been hanging around the tiny town of Churchill, Manitoba, ground zero for everything having to do with polar bears. Every fall the town is overrun with bears waiting for Hudson Bay to freeze. The bears, in turn, are trailed by herds of tourists, tour guides, scientists, green-leaning types and B-list celebrities—all looking for communion with The Most Important Animal of Our Time.
What worried me wasn’t what the biologist had to say, but what the woman who had occupied that same seat three minutes earlier had said about the very same bears. A publicist for an environmental advocacy group, she shook her head ruefully. “It’s just so sad,” she exhaled. “They all look so skinny that it’s hard to look at them.”
I went north for a simple reason: I wanted to be a hero of the environmental movement and write a poetic obituary for a doomed species. The Center for Biological Diversity—the environmental group that sued the U.S. government to put polar bears on the Endangered Species list—had predicted that “two-thirds of the world’s polar bears could be extinct by 2050.”
But after months of reporting and hundreds of bear sightings, I kept running up against an inconvenient truth: There were a lot of well-meaning, well-credentialed scientists, wildlife officers and local experts who simply didn’t believe that polar bears were one ice cube away from extinction. And they had the numbers to prove it.
Which was good news for the bears…even if it was terrible news for their careers as symbols of environmental doom.
Let’s start with what we know. Almost everybody agrees that there are between 20,000 and 25,000 polar bears alive today. Here’s another thing almost everyone agrees on: That number is a whole lot bigger than it was 40 years ago.
So there you have it, the next time somebody tells you that the polar bears are dying out, you’ll know better. They’re most certainly not.
Lefty Begone: Global Warming Causes Less Snow, Unless It Snows More, in Which Case It Causes More Snow. No More Questions!
What ever happened to the looming ice age that was to spell doom for humanity? Remember the warnings from the 1970s? (Well, I don’t remember them—I wasn’t alive—but I have read about them.) If politicians, by which I mean liberal ones, were consistent in their conclusion-jumping—and not only consistent, but smart—they’d quickly latch back on to that story to fleece the public out of even more money, because, given the Snowpocalypse of 2010 in which we here in Virginia had to shovel two feet of global warming out of our driveways, and given the Snowmageddon that’s expected in New England as of this writing, it looks like an ice age is on the horizon.
I do miss the fears my elementary school teachers tried to fill me with regarding that nefarious acid rain. We kids knew what acid was. It was what burned and melted everything it came into contact with. It was what gave Two Face two faces. We felt pretty invincible drinking orange juice and reading the ingredient “citric acid.”
But warnings in the ’90s that the rain would eventually do to Earth what the pail of water did to the Wicked Witch at the end of The Wizard of Oz was not scaring us kiddies or the low-information voters near enough to be a lucrative addendum to our education. Politicians needed something more immediately apparent to take the place of acid rain.
What is something that people actually witness and feel, and not only that, but what is something that people actually complain about?
The temperature!
(This is where liberals say that “climate change” is not about the temperature, but about the climate. But that’s a bunch of crap; the initial warning of “global warming” was that the globe was warming. The word “warming” refers to temperature. The only reason the politicians have changed the label to “climate change” is because there was no warming occurring out of the ordinary. Temperatures are cyclical and travel over the globe in such a way that there are years of warmer temperatures followed by years of cooler temperatures. Get over it. It was originally called “global warming,” not “climate change,” so I’m calling it “global warming.” It’s not my fault if that label no longer perfectly fits the liberal narrative.)
Changing the temperature of an entire planet was a great cause to get low-information voters behind. Who doesn’t complain when it’s a hundred degrees outside and the humidity makes you want to cry? Thus global warming became the cause du jour, something of which the politicians could remind everybody every single summer, when people are really feeling the heat. Autumn comes, then winter and spring, and global warming is forgotten about. But the advent of summer always brings with it sirens being sounded by politicians. “Man, d’ya feel that heat? Can you feel it suckin’ the water right outa ya? Sheesh, that global warming is really somethin’! Say, if you slide me over a bit a’ your money, I can make that go away for ya.”
Remember when congressional Democrats told us that global warming would cause less snow? Remember when alarmist David Viner of the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia (of Climategate notoriety) said that global warming would soon render snowfalls a “very rare and exciting event” and that ”Children just aren’t going to know what snow is”? Remember Greenpeace and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change telling us the same thing in 1993 and in 2001, respectively? (Both those links are dead now, but those were the original sources.)
Well, now that the facts of more snow are contradicting original prophecy, the consensus among scientists is that global warming—a heating up of the planet—causes more snow.
So heads up, New England. Feet and feet of cold, icy global warming is snow-falling your way.
“Global warming” is the cause of the high murder rate in Chicago.
Title:
Acid Oceans, Osteoporosis of the Sea: the Failed Global Warming Scare.
Soure:
Uploaded by jersnav on Oct 22, 2011
Willie Soon, Ph.D. Dr. Soon is Chief Science Researcher at the Science and Public Policy Institute and author of The Maunder Minimum. From the 28th Annual Meeting of the Doctors for Disaster Preparedness, held June 12, 2010 in Orlando, Florida.
Last time I checked. Coffee & Chocolate liked hot places. I bet if Global Warming was real. They would grow even better. Why? Because, more place would be open to these crops. As more places would b warmer. Idiots!!!!
Title:
The Newest Global Warming Scare: Coffee & Chocolate Will Disappear If We Do Nothing.
Source:
Uploaded by FederalJacktube6 on Oct 15, 2011
Nobel Prize-Winning Physicist Resigns Over Global Warming
Dr. Ivar Giaever, a former professor with Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and the 1973 winner of the Nobel Prize in physics, abruptly announced his resignation Tuesday, Sept. 13, from the premier physics society in disgust over its officially stated policy that “global warming is occurring.”
The official position of the American Physical Society (APS) supports the theory that man’s actions have inexorably led to the warming of the planet, through increased emissions of carbon dioxide.
Giaever does not agree — and put it bluntly and succinctly in the subject line of his email, reprinted at Climate Depot, a website devoted to debunking the theory of man-made climate change.
“I resign from APS,” Giaever wrote.
Giaever was cooled to the statement on warming theory by a line claiming that “the evidence is incontrovertible.”
“In the APS it is ok to discuss whether the mass of the proton changes over time and how a multi-universe behaves, but the evidence of global warming is incontrovertible?” he wrote in an email to Kate Kirby, executive officer of the physics society.
“The claim … is that the temperature has changed from ~288.0 to ~288.8 degree Kelvin in about 150 years, which (if true) means to me is that the temperature has been amazingly stable, and both human health and happiness have definitely improved in this ‘warming’ period,” his email message said.
A spokesman for the APS confirmed to FoxNews.com that the Nobel Laureate had declined to pay his annual dues in the society and had resigned. He also noted that the society had no plans to revise its statement.
The use of the word “incontrovertible” had already caused debate within the group, so much so that an addendum was added to the statement discussing its use in April, 2010.
“The word ‘incontrovertible’ … is rarely used in science because by its very nature, science questions prevailing ideas. The observational data indicate a global surface warming of 0.74 °C (+/- 0.18 °C) since the late 19th century.”
Giaever earned his Nobel for his experimental discoveries regarding tunneling phenomena in superconductors. He has since become a vocal dissenter from the alleged “consensus” regarding man-made climate fears, Climate Depot reported, noting that he was one of more than 100 co-signers of a 2009 letter to President Obama critical of his position on climate change.
Public perception of climate change has steadily fallen since late 2009. A Rasmussen Reports public opinion poll from August noted that 57 percent of adults believe there is significant disagreement within the scientific community on global warming, up five points from late 2009.
The same study showed that 69 percent of those polled believe it’s at least somewhat likely that some scientists have falsified research data in order to support their own theories and beliefs. Just 6 percent felt confident enough to report that such falsification was “not at all likely.”
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/09/14/nobel-prize-winning-physicist-resigns-from-top-physics-group-over-global/#ixzz1Y3eWQ300
R.I.P. Man Made Global Warming Fears 1988-2010
Uploaded by jersnav on Jun 2, 2011
Marc Morano is Chief Correspondent & Executive Editor at http://www.ClimateDepot.com. This presentation is from the 2010 Doctors for Disaster Preparedness meeting, held June 2010 in Orlando, Florida.
Bill Nye “The Science Guy” Defends Al Gore
Uploaded by ramzpaul on Aug 31, 2011
Al Gore claims that those who question man made global warming are similar to racists. Bill Nye compares races to dog breeds in defense of Al Gore.
Al Gore: Climate Change Deniers will Be Hated Like Racists one Day
Who is this bloated idiot fooling? His mansion probably uses more power than most of us consume in a week. Sacrifice what you have Gore, you lying, cheating, manipulative douche. Thankfully for you there are so many idiots so quick to believe whatever drivel the television tells them; so you can still make a living from this complete utter bs.
EPIC FAIL - Al Gore Compares Global Warming Skepticism To Racism
Uploaded by UrbanWarfareChannel on Aug 28, 2011
ManBearPig Al Gore does it again. No, he hasn’t claimed to have invented the internet again. He’s now claiming that the issue of rejecting climate change is similar to the issue of racism.
Al Gore Goes Crazy On Anti Global Warming Scientists, Calling All This Bullshit
Uploaded by MrTimotheus85 on Aug 9, 2011
Al Gore Goes Crazy On Anti Global Warming Scientists, Calling All This Bullshit
Al Gore Delivers Angry Rant Against Anti-Global Warming ‘Pseudo-Scientist’ ‘Bullshit’
http://www.mediaite.com/online/al-gore-delivers-angry-rant-against-anti-globa…



