I don’t have a future, this is why.
With Obamacare and the individual mandate being upheld. I don’t have much of a future left. With the student loans I have, and can’t pay for. The no ability of getting work, do I can pay may debts.
Now were not only the mandate is a required purchase and jail-able offense with massive fines. It is now also a tax. Guess what? Now I am going to be a tax evader a another jail-able offense.
This means I am a criminal, there for I could go to jail. On top of that It will make it almost impossible to get work. I would never pass a background check. All because something I can’t offered to pay in the first place because I have no employment.
My only option at this point is suicide. I have no future, it is dead. No job, most likely ending up in jail. With a massive student debt. What do I have? Nothing!!!!!!!!!
- Thanks Obamacare: 83% of Doctors Surveyed Say They May Quit (askmarion.wordpress.com)
- Breaking: Mitt Romney Pushed The Individual Mandate, Emails Show! (dailypaul.com)
- Five Devastating Effects Obamacare Will Have on Young Adults (heritage.org)
Dr. John C. Goodman on Healthcare Mandates (by independentinstitute)
Originally aired March 29, 2012. Research Fellow Dr. John C. Goodman, author of “Priceless,” on GBTV discussing the pending US Supreme Court ruling on the Affordable Care Act.
To order copies of “Priceless,” please visit
http://www.independent.org/priceless/ or call Toll Free1-800-297-8733 .
Discount Price: $21 (16% off regular $24.95) plus tax and shipping.
For more video and audio please visit:
http://www.independent.org/multimedia/
A Unanimous Privacy Victory in U.S. v. Jones (Jim Harper and Julian Sanchez) (by catoinstitutevideo)
http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/u-s-v-jones-a-big-privacy-win/
http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/jonesing-for-a-fourth-amendment-upgrade/
http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=13734
In U.S. v. Jones, the Supreme Court has held that attaching a GPS device to a vehicle and then using the device to monitor the vehicle’s movements constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment. What does this case mean for broader privacy protections under the Fourth Amendment? The Cato Institute’s Jim Harper and Julian Sanchez assess the ruling.
Video produced by Caleb O. Brown and Austin Bragg.
Washington, DC: Demanding that President Obama shut down the prison at Guantanamo, protesters march from the White House to the U.S. Supreme Court on the 10th anniversary of indefinite detentions, January 11, 2012.
Photos by Kevi Brannelly and Jen Nessel
(via thephrygiancap)
Supreme Court Justices ‘Blast’ EPA For Telling Couple They Can’t Build on ‘Protected Wetlands’
- Posted on January 9, 2012 at 8:58pm by
Becket Adams
Several conservative members of the Supreme Court criticized the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Monday for heavy-handed enforcement of rules affecting homeowners after the government told an Idaho couple they can’t challenge an order declaring their future home site a “protected wetlands.”
Chantell and Mike Sackett (Image Courtesy: Business Insider)
VERY QUIETLY OBAMA’S CITIZENSHIP CASE REACHES THE SUPREME COURT
VERY QUIETLY OBAMA’S CITIZENSHIP CASE REACHES THE SUPREME COURT
Released today, the transcript school indicates that Barack Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia as an undergraduate. The transcript was released by Occidental College in compliance with a court order. The transcript shows that Obama (Soetoro) applied for financial aid and was awarded a fellowship for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program. To qualify, for the scholarship, a student must claim foreign citizenship.
IMPEACH, INDICT, ARREST!
(via joswpagan)
That a direct requirement for most Americans to purchase any product or service seems an intrusive exercise of legislative power surely explains why Congress has not used this authority before–but that seems to us a political judgment rather than a recognition of constitutional limitations. It certainly is an encroachment on individual liberty, but it is no more so than a command that restaurants or hotels are obliged to serve all customers regardless of race, that gravely ill individuals cannot use a substance their doctors described as the only effective palliative for excruciating pain, or that a farmer cannot grow enough wheat to support his own family.
The right to be free from federal regulation is not absolute, and yields to the imperative that Congress be free to forge national solutions to national problems, no matter how local–or seemingly passive–their individual origins,
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, upholding the Individual Mandate in an opinion published today.
h/t Sullivan
(via letterstomycountry)
Will not be forced to buy federally mandated healthcare
With the Washington DC district court of appeals saying it is the right of congress to legislate what your have to buy, in the case health care.
I have decided I will never do this. I will not buy this mandatory health insurance. If it means I am going to jail. So be it. I can not morally support anything of this nature. On top of all of this. Its not like I can offered it anyway. Fining again wont do any good. I can’t offered that. Like trying to get water from a stone.
I hate it when the people who are proponents of forcing everyone to buy healthcare to car insurence. That is a poor comparison. I can chose not to drive. In fact I don’t even own a car at this point in time. Healthcare on the other hand. The only way out is to commit suicide. Of course even that is against the law in a lot of states.
So police state come and get me!!!! Not like I have quality of life. They way your taking away all my liberties for the sake of the so called greater good. I am ready to be a martyr for liberty.
Racial politics return with Cain allegations
Herman Cain’s rise as a presidential contender was supposed to prove that race didn’t matter in the Republican Party. Cain is fast making it the only thing that does.
The black conservative is trying to navigate around allegations that he sexually harassed at least three women, implying that the accusations surfaced because he is black. Hours after the claims were reported, Cain’s supporters branded his trouble a “high-tech lynching.” That’s the term coined 20 years ago by another black conservative, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, after his confirmation hearings for the court were rocked by allegations of sexual harassment.
Title:
Judge Napolitano - Recognition of States Rights and the 2nd Amendment.
Source:
Uploaded by jersnav on Oct 17, 2011
http://www.foxnews.com Judge Napolitano has Damon Root on as his guest as they discuss the upcoming Supreme Court ruling that will effect the States abilities to recognize individually there own liberties and in particular the 2nd Amendment.
Your opinion.
What is your honest opinion on Occupy (Name the city)? Is it a force for good or a force for evil. Or is it to complicated. Tell me what you think.
Answer this by hitting the “Ask me anything” button. So if it is clean language. In other words not a bunch of words that would make your grandmother blush. I will post it. Regardless if I agree with it or not. Or Submit it as a story.
“Progressive” Ralliers Call for Lynching of Clarence Thomas
Uploaded by ChristianHartsock on Feb 2, 2011
Demonstrators at “progressive” rally in Palm Springs call for Clarence Thomas be hanged, stringed up, tortured, sent back to the fields, etc.
“Uncloaking the Kochs” rally sponsored by Common Cause, AFFCE, The Ruckus Society, 350, Greenpeace, Code Pink, the Progessive Democrats of America, and others. Staged outside venue of Koch Brothers conference in Palm Springs.
Christian Hartsock reporting.
The Government’s War on Cameras!
Uploaded by ReasonTV on May 26, 2011
Who will watch the watchers? In a world of ubiquitous, hand-held digital cameras, that’s not an abstract philosophical question. Police everywhere are cracking down on citizens using cameras to capture breaking news and law enforcement in action.
In 2009, police arrested blogger and freelance photographer Antonio Musumeci on the steps of a New York federal courthouse. His alleged crime? Unauthorized photography on federal property.
Police cuffed and arrested Musumeci, ultimately issuing him a citation. With the help of the New York Civil Liberties Union, he forced a settlement in which the federal government agreed to issue a memo acknowledging that it is totally legal to film or photograph on federal property.
Although the legal right to film on federal property now seems to be firmly established, many other questions about public photography still remain and place journalists and citizens in harm’s way. Can you record a police encounter? Can you film on city or state property? What are a photographer’s rights in so-called public spaces?
These questions will remain unanswered until a case reaches the Supreme Court, says UCLA Law Professor Eugene Volokh, founder of the popular law blog The Volokh Conspiracy. Until then, it’s up to people to know their rights and test the limits of free speech, even at the risk of harassment and arrest.
Who will watch the watchers? All of us, it turns out, but only if we’re willing to fight for our rights.
Produced by Hawk Jensen and Zach Weissmueller. Camera by Jim Epstein and Jensen. About 7.30 minutes.
Go to http://reason.com/blog/2011/05/26/reasontv-the-governments-war for links and more articles, including Reason magazine’s January 2011 cover story, “The War on Cameras” and the companion piece “How to Record the Cops.”
Go to http://reason.tv for downloadable versions of the video and subscribe to Reason.tv’s YouTube channel to receive automatic notification when new material goes live.
